Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine, 2020
Prof. Charles M. Rice
Rockefeller University, USA
A virus once beyond treatment, now cured in weeks.
Global infectious disease: triumphs and challenges
· Tzu Chi University
The guide video for this lecture is in production.
Hepatitis C infected tens of millions worldwide and ended in cirrhosis and liver cancer. Rice's work made it possible to grow the virus in the laboratory for the first time, which is what opened the way to a cure. He takes that as the starting point for what is still missing before the next outbreak.
Full lecture
Interview
Two versions, side by side
Each laureate spoke twice: the formal lecture in Stockholm in the year of the award, and this one in Taiwan. Years apart, before a different audience, the account is not always the same. The pair repays watching together.
The Taiwan lecture
30 March 2026
Tzu Chi University
Further up this page, ready to play.
The original Nobel Lecture
2020
Stockholm
The formal lecture from the prize year, on nobelprize.org, with video and transcript.
- One body of research; what each talk chose to include.
- From peers in Stockholm to students in Taiwan: how the telling changes.
- What has been revised between the prize year and now.
My notes
Learning area →A private notebook for this lecture. Everything you write stays in your own browser and is saved as you type. The fields follow the three stages set out in the learning area: write the question you want to ask before it (prepare), set down the argument once you have heard it (attend), then your own response and a further question (reflect).
This browser will not let the site keep anything, so what you write disappears when you leave the page. The usual causes are a private window or a setting that blocks site data. Copy anything you need first.
-
1Prepare
Before the lecture: settle on this one, watch the guide and the original Nobel Lecture, and write the question you want to ask.
Look up whatever you do not know — the official citation on nobelprize.org, the laureate’s own institution, Wikipedia. An hour of background changes what the same fifty minutes is worth.
A question for the speaker These three are the judging criteria of the Into the Nobel question competition.- Depth: it reaches the trade-offs and limits behind the work.
- Logic: the question stands up, and its premise holds.
- Originality: the answer cannot simply be looked up.
-
2Attend
While you listen or watch: note that you have seen the Taiwan lecture, and set down the argument in your own words.
The speaker’s core argument What the lecture argues — in your own words. -
3Reflect
Afterwards: your own response, and what you would still ask.
Your reflection What surprised you, what you disagree with, how it differs from the original Nobel Lecture.An extension question (at least one) Something the speaker would want to answer, and that cannot be looked up.
What you write stays in this browser and is never uploaded. It disappears if you switch machines or clear site data, so keep a copy of anything you need.
Notes are to be written by the student; how each field is written (typed, pasted or inserted automatically) is recorded alongside it and goes into the file exported from the learning area.
Watch next
-
Has a guide video 4 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine, 2013 Prof. Thomas C. Südhof Nerve cells pass a signal with a millisecond to spare. -
Has a guide video 4 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine, 1993 Dr. Sir Richard J. Roberts A gene is not one continuous piece of text. -
Has a guide video 2 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine, 2014 Prof. May-Britt Moser A set of cells lays a coordinate grid over space.